Your independent source of truth.

In our assessment, the institutional Church wields disproportionate influence over Poland’s legal system and education, and its financing from public funds remains opaque. Religious and fundamentalist organisations effectively block social reforms, imposing an ideological diktat on public debate. We demand full transparency of the financial flows between the state and religious associations, a genuine separation of Church and state, and the equality of everyone - individuals and institutions alike - before the law, with no privileges whatsoever.

We believe that trust in Poland’s electoral process has been seriously undermined, and the state is doing nothing to rebuild it. We filed election protests and motions for a recount of the votes of the 2020 and 2025 presidential elections - full documentation in the Chronicle above. Instead of honest verification, we received months of delay and evasive replies. Until the votes are recounted and the ballots and protocols secured and examined, the legitimacy of the authorities thus elected remains, in our assessment, an open question. We also oppose subordinating Polish politics to the interests of foreign powers and foreign corporations. We demand full civic control of every election - from the ballot box to the protocol.

Our position is uncompromising: until the 2025 votes are recounted, the elections repeated, and the PiS governments genuinely held to account, the legitimacy of the authorities thus elected remains, in our assessment, an open question - because without honestly counted votes there is no mandate to wield power.

The experience of our own cases reveals a system in which a court decision can wait eight months to be dispatched, and the real time to hear an appeal is measured in years. Closed legal corporations are in practice subject to no effective civic control, and the excessive length of proceedings shuts citizens out of holding power to account. We demand full transparency of disciplinary proceedings, hard procedural deadlines - the breach of which resolves the case in the citizen’s favour - and the personal accountability of public officials for delay and inaction. We will write these principles into the New Civic Constitution.

In our assessment, refusing to disclose the full list of people surveilled with systems such as Pegasus or Hermes is contrary to the duties of a state governed by the rule of law. We believe it is the statutory and moral obligation of the government and the special services to notify, without delay, every person against whom such measures were used, and to allow them genuine judicial review. We demand full transparency in this matter and independent oversight of the services - no one who wields power may stand above the law.